Star vector created by upklyak — www.freepik.com

Things we can be pretty sure about more advanced civilizations even without a first contact

Ladislav Nevery
6 min readJun 12, 2021

First, let's address the elephant in the room.

So who is operating these supersonic vehicles doing 90 right angle turns while pulling 600g in space air or water. Vehicles more and more frequently seeking and violating sensitive parts of military US airspace? Here is a transcript of Luis Elizondo the former director of US pentagon Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) here and here

  1. we are 99% sure it is not foreign adversarial technology
  2. so that one leaves one other option its someone or something else

But if there is on a daily basis technology superior to US violating US military airspace confirmed by nobody less than US president. Why the former commander of the strongest military on Earth felt a need to confirm existence of UFO? A word long associated with great stigma and risked being laughed at? Which he immediately was. When we know he is a savvy politician? Most probably because he thought situation is getting serious enough for it to be worth it. Maybe he rather wanted to be remembered as the one being laughed at than as the one who was silent when people needed to be warned.

The already nonzero probability of not being alone in the universe due to these now US government/president confirmed sightings of superior technology did suddenly become somewhat higher.

Let’s discuss this now clearly not zero possibility of more advanced technology/civilization confronting us right now and possible consequences of it.

What can we deduce about them just from our own observations of the universe? Nature and physics laws that seem to govern all atoms, molecules, the evolution of life, and DNA’s typically selfish genes from those molecules in particular?

Let’s start with the basics. If they evolved from the simplest self-improving life forms on their planet as we did. What do we know is true for all known and even the simplest life forms?

Constant violent fight for limited resources in order to survive and grow.

Star vector created by upklyak — www.freepik.com

1. Every stage of evolution They probably had to survive constant violent competition for limited resources too

What survival strategies do usually self-emerge even in simplest observed real or simulated life forms? Assimilation or Elimination or as we humans call it a Violence

Star vector created by upklyak — www.freepik.com

2. If evolved and faced natural selection then the Their genome probably favored the survival of selfish genes too

Those who had grown faster legs or bigger teeth to get to the limited resources survived and grown at expense of those who didn’t. Creating different tiers and hierarchies or as we call it. A food-chain

3. They probably had a history full of Assimilate/Eliminate decisions as a result of selfish gene expressions (Wars)

War is just a different name for limited resources and selfish gene competition. You can clearly see the history of all the human selfish gene competition in this video of the border movements. Essentially the same population growth and border movement that you can observe in the petri dish with multiple types of bacteria

As we speak evolution is equipping all known lifeforms with all kinds of new weapons.

Star vector created by upklyak — www.freepik.com

4. They probably faced naturally occurring weapons as a part of the food chain thus probably had Weapons development History too

Evolution equips animals with all kinds of mechanical claws or jaws ripping opponent’s heads left and right, or chemical weapons with all kinds of toxins or poisons. Observe power hierarchies of ants, chemical weapons of ants, wars of ants.

So it seems that War and Weapons are just a naturally occurring side product of evolution everywhere and this buck surely doesn’t stop with earth.

Current human “Head in the sand strategy”

A head in the sand strategy is great and usually supported with “worked great so far” local minimum strategies until you actually reach the edge of the cliff. Natural instinct of every self-preserving politician or high-ranking military personnel for nearly 70 years has been to distance himself from any stigma-associated word that can drag his career down. Yet in light of new hard to ignore evidence and escalating military nature of those contacts. The head in the sand strategy can unfortunately only take you so far. Yes suppressing any mention of technology superior to the US for years allowed enjoying the “Top dog” position a bit longer but there is no longer any benefit in that. Quite opposite global cooperation and information sharing about these vehicle movements on vast air / sea bed areas, vehicle limits concentrations, and capabilities has strategically globally bigger importance.

A big rise in army verified sightings in nuclear military space and recently in 2019 even some conflict provocations.

A Fmr. Deputy Asst. Seccy of Defense of Intelligence describing current situation. Essentially we are out of the observation-only phase and in 2019 clearly entered poking a stick phase. But why is this happening?

  • Maybe our increased recently heavily accelerated efforts to spread beyond earth via rapid spacex starship development, moon base in 3 years, and mars base in 4 years plan while humans continue the slaughter of innocent civilians in Siria Afganistan Yemen middle east?
  • Perhaps the fact that all planet fantastic lifeforms are now on brink of inevitable destruction due to rapid climate change?

Given that we witness technology allowing unrestricted covert movement over any house anywhere anytime and at the same time they are so focused on the best human military capabilities. Is it unreasonable to expect the ability to influence the behavior/decision-making of the select few in command due to obvious technological advantages?

Would it also not partially explain why these frequent observations were so consistently dismissed for 70 years without any logical explanation just from the position of power? If not what mechanisms/tests are in place to prevent such a situation?

But the final important question arises immediately.

What will happen if we are no longer considered as a contained threat?

It’s 2021. Yet look at the mass slaughter of civilians in Afghanistan Syria middle east. Look at millions of vaccines expiring in the US selfishly refusing to share even recipes for their mass manufacturing in global pandemics while developing countries like India are filling mass graves?

So what will happen if we actually start building those bases on the moon and on the mars before we get our racist bigot planets destroying selfish gene shit together? Before we do major cleanup in our violent selfish DNA?

Whatever more advanced civilization is watching us right now and clearly poking a stick to us.

It is probably thinking…

  • let’s increase in scale of our human threat assessment due to their increased efforts to become multi-planetary and spread exponentially. Let’s learn as much as possible about where and how to neutralize their strongest weapons. While they are not a threat to us. They definitely can be to lesser evolved but resource-rich life forms out there. Let’s show and demonstrate our cruisers to their navy cruisers as a deterrent signal.
  • This zoo on earth is locally rare and beautiful and should be protected from those crazy planet-destroying apes.
  • Perhaps trade them surely a huge technology boost with economy and environment just before they destroy themself for a promise to not pursue becoming multi-planetary until morally ready
  • Nah, let’s just continue mining their rare unobtanium deposits they have no idea about
  • Let’s continue monitoring and improving evolution acceleration experiments but pick a better candidate for round 3 A hamster perhaps?

--

--

Ladislav Nevery

Curious mind that just cant be turned off. It demands a lot of sugar so mine memory is no longer than 10s. Which is great since life is a lot less stressful now